Subject	what is the problem or shortcoming of their actuators?
Posted by	LJZTT on October 28, 2006 at 1:45 PM
	This message has been viewed 35 times.
In Reply To	I would go with either 740's or 850's... posted by Kong ZTT GT28R MD on October 28, 2006 at 12:56 PM
Message	Why are those two better? Tsk tsk, some people just don't know when to stfu search said you suck (n/m) - Wilks. 01:38:02 09/06/06
Follow Ups	700bb turbos?'s - DaRealDefaulTT 12:32:50 10/28/06 I would go with either 740's or 850's... - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 12:56:50 10/28/06 what is the problem or shortcoming of their actuators? - LJZTT 13:45:38 10/28/06 the ones that come on the GT28RS and GT28R from Garrett - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 15:08:24 10/28/06 It doesn't sound like he's buying them directly from Garrett - maglito 16:04:28 10/28/06 Re: It doesn't sound like he's buying them directly from Garrett - DaRealDefaulTT 16:22:05 10/28/06 Too many variables to say - maglito 23:50:15 10/28/06 Re: Too many variables to say - DaRealDefaulTT 07:20:01 10/29/06 get adjustable actuators. - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 14:00:46 10/29/06 the 700bb come with adjustable actuators (n/m) - maglito 20:14:50 10/29/06 he is talking about the GT28RS turbo - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 01:00:00 10/30/06 so by being adjustable you can set the base boost level - LJZTT 02:03:28 10/29/06 yea.. its the space problems.. - Kong ZTT GT28R MD 14:02:09 10/29/06 Re: I would go with either 740's or 850's... - DaRealDefaulTT 16:19:54 10/28/06 You can use 555s, but you will be limited as to what boost - dmv300z 13:28:08 10/28/06 I would go with the 740cc specially with 700bb, 555cc would - Eishozzzz 15:21:07 10/28/06 2nd, swap the housing (n/m) - maglito 16:05:21 10/28/06 Re: I would go with the 740cc specially with 700bb, 555cc would - DaRealDefaulTT 16:24:39 10/28/06 I think the housings are like 150 each, not really sure. - maglito 23:58:17 10/28/06 JWT also sells the 700bb is a .64 you just have to ask for - blacktwin 23:01:48 10/29/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.